Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Madden v. Franzen et al
as 2:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
Franzen, Knewgen, Barbara Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Spence et al
as 4:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
Quewaune Henderson
Defendant:
Officer Thomas Spence and Officer James Huling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saunders v. Hicks et al
as 5:2015cv04438
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene Saunders
Defendant:
Officer Hicks, Officer James, Officer Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. G. J. Branker
as 15-7486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Plaintiff:
CHARDAN WHITEHEAD, TIJUAN WILSON, SAMUEL MCCRAE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
G. J. BRANKER, SERGEANT PRADO, OFFICER LANCASTER and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT REED, OFFICER MOORE, OFFICER PRESS and others
Douglas Green v. South Carolina Dept of Corr
as 14-7337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LIEUTENANT SANDRA KIRKLAND, OFFICER JAMES MCELROY and others
Brett v. Fed Ex Office et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Fed Ex Office, Jo Ann Fabrics, City of Orlando, FL Police Department Officer James Strawn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matney v. Hale et al
as 7:2012cv00627
Defendant:
Mr. Nicholas B. Compton, Officer James H. Hale and Officer Ricky Jackson
Plaintiff:
Carter W. Matney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Shannon v. Bernard McKie
as 12-6018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL SHANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD MCKIE, ASSOCIATE WARDEN JOYNER, MAJOR JACKSON and others
Hallman v. Metts et al
as 6:2010cv02518
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hallman
Defendant:
James Metts, Captain Oneal, Major Quigg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
