Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jeremy Defour v. Lieutenant Webber
as 23-7010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WEBBER, OFFICER BEATY, a/k/a Officer Bates, INTELLIGENCE OFFICER ROSSON and others
Wingate v. City of New York
as 22-1668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Blake Wingate
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Correction Officer Wallace, No. 14135, Correction Officer Hall, Badge # 13815, R.N.D.C. Mailroom and others
Defendant:
Correction Officer Smith, A.M.K.C. Mail Room
Myron Moton v. Wetzel, et al
as 20-2432
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, DAVY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
HAILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
ALVIN M. HAILEY
Defendant:
COUNSELOR MARSHALL, JOHN WETZEL, OFFICER HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Myron Moton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2773
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. SWIFT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
ALSTON v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2019cv00096
Defendant:
DOCTOR LOCKLEAR, SERGANT GRANT and OFFICER STANTON
Plaintiff:
MASTER MAURICE ALSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT, DORINE VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
MYRON MOTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Alston v. Locklear et al
as 5:2019ct03018
Defendant:
Doctor Locklear, Sergant Grant and Officer Stanton
Plaintiff:
Master Maurice Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. LAWRENCE et al
as 5:2018cv00372
Defendant:
OFFICER LAWRENCE, OFFICER STANTON and OFFICER WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
DANTE COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv01304
Defendant:
Deputy Mazukiewiez, Lieutenant Supervised Cell Extraction Team Unit, Dorine Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
