Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Barnes v. Waddel et al
as 5:2020ct03120
Defendant:
Warden Waddel, Correctional Officer Wheeler and Warden Waddell
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Marshal et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00850
Defendant:
Sgt. Marshal, Officer Wheeler and T. Ivey
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroud v. Orangeburg County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv01191
Plaintiff:
Earl Martin Stroud, Jr.
Defendant:
Orangeburg County Detention Center, Vernita Doizer , Officer Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamze v. Union Correctional Institution
as 3:2015cv01037
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
Warden of Union C.I., Assistant Warden Johnson, Brian Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Medlin et al
as 3:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Davidson
Defendant:
FNU Medlin, FNU Quinn, Pat Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belfield v. Fox et al
as 5:2012ct03198
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rashawn Belfield
Defendant:
Sgt. Fox, Sgt. Townsen, Officer Adkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOKER v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00213
Defendant:
OFFICER BALLARD, JULIE BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROUDABUSH v. HIGGS et al
as 7:2012cv00109
Defendant:
SCOTT BAIRD, BRANDT, DONALDSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIST v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00275
Defendant:
HARVEY CHURCH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR J. JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
KARIM O. GIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wheeler et al
as 8:2010cv02551
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Wheeler, FNU Kovalislsi, L-Dorm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
