Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 115
Lake County, Illinois v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv02402
Plaintiff: Lake County, Illinois
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv80431
Defendant: Sandoz, Inc., Indivior Inc., Asserto Therapeutics and others
Plaintiff: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, Alachua County, FL, Levy County, FL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re: Valsartan Losartan and Irbesartan Products
as 23-8006
Petitioner: CVS PHARMACY INC, RITE AID CORP, WALGREEN CO and others
Respondent: CONSUMER ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS, THIRD-PARTY PAYOR PLAINTIFFS and MEDICAL MONITORING PLAINTIFFS
Not Yet Classified: PRODUCT LIABILITY ADVISORY COUNCIL INC
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv21048
Plaintiff: Palm Beach County, FL., Alachua County, FL, Levy County, FL and others
Defendant: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz, Inc., West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
The Medical Society of the State of New York v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.
as 22-2702
Plaintiff: Albert B. Knapp, M.D., P.C., on its own behalf and in the name of his business, which is identical, both directly and as the representative of PATIENT G; and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Dr. Darrick Antell, in the name of his business and on its own behalf, Podiatric OR of Midtown Manhattan, P.C., on its own behalf and on behalf of its patients, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: The Medical Society of the State of New York, on behalf of its members, Society of New York Office Based Surgery Facilities, on behalf of its members and Columbia East Side Surgery, P.C., both directly and as the representative of PATIENTS C, D, E and F
Defendant / Appellee: UnitedHealth Group Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc., United HealthCare Insurance Company and others
Jesse Polansky, et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3810
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, EXECUTIVE HEALTH RESOURCES INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JESSE POLANSKY, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant: TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWERS CENTER and others
Amicus Curiae: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rutledge v. Eli Lilly and Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00549
Defendant: Evernorth Health Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc and others
Plaintiff: Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00674
Defendant: Evernorth Health, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc. and others
Plaintiff: The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv04364
Defendant: EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
In Re: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff: The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General
Respondent: Zinc Health Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Chickasaw Nation v. CVS Caremark, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00488
Defendant: Aetna Health, Inc., Caremark RX, LLC, OptumRX, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: The Chickasaw Nation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?