Cases 31 - 40 of 5,964
David Hough et al v. Ryan Carroll et al
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
David Hough, Mouloud Hocine, Jennifer Lehmkuhl Hill and others
Defendant:
Ryan Carroll, Max K. Day, Max O. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Smith v. Valley Oaks Health, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
Valley Oaks Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00229
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hayes, Cordney v. Dixxon et al
as 4:2024cv10033
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yvonne Dixxon, Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Sternfeld et al v. Oak Park, City of
as 2:2024cv10846
Plaintiff:
Howard Sternfeld and Joyce Sternfeld
Defendant:
City of Oak Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
