Cases 1 - 10 of 452
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Dion Horton, et al v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos, et al
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
DION HORTON, DAMON JONES, CRAIG BROWNLEE and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JILL RANGOS, in her official capacity, FRANK J. SCHERER, DIRECTOR OF ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE, in his official capacity, ANTHONY M. MARIANI, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDGE and others
Oden v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Carla Oden
Defendant:
Exactech Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oden v. Lumpkin
as 24-40044
Petitioner:
John David Oden
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 23-4077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Oden v. Ruble
as 6:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
Dillon Eugene Oden
Defendant:
Lt. C. Ruble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ODEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33449
Plaintiff:
REGINALD ODEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. Oden et al
as 2:2023cv05626
Plaintiff:
Monique B Holmes
Defendant:
Wilbur Lee Oden, Jr, J&M Tank Lines, Inc. and Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Newton v. Oden
as 3:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Sye Christopher Ras Newton
Defendant:
Georgette P. Oden doing business as G. Oden PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
