Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Atkinson v. The City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2020cv00351
Defendant:
David Miller, Bernard Condlin, Esq., The City of Fayetteville and others
Plaintiff:
Gerard Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOWDEN v. 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OFFICE et al
as 1:2019cv01102
Defendant:
LISA S. COSTNER, DAVID SIPPRELL, OFFICE OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN BOWDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. NC General Assembly et al
as 5:2018ct03269
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Office of Indigent Defense Services, NC General Assembly and others
Plaintiff:
Traven Marquet Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. NC Prisoner Legal Services, Inc et al
as 5:2013ct03158
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
NC Prisoner Legal Services, Inc, Mary Pollard, Staff Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDMAN v. MAHER, et al
as 1:2013cv00389
Plaintiff:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant:
THOMAS K. MAHER, DANIELLE M. CARMAN, HEATHER L. RATTELADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Maher et al
as 5:2013ct03088
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Thomas K. Maher, Danielle M. Carman, Heather L. Rattelade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burney v. Bray et al
as 5:2013ct03049
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Burney, Jr.
Defendant:
D.W. Bray, North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Inc., Office of Indigent Defense Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C.T. v. Bentley et al
as 2:2011cv01123
Plaintiff:
C. T.
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , The Administrative Office of Courts , Callie T. Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael McRae v. Michael Easley
as 08-7853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL EASLEY, BOYD BENNETT, MICHAEL S. HAMDEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
