Cases 1 - 10 of 14
King v. Atchinson et al
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Roy D King
Defendant:
Atchinson, Officer Armstrong and Schliseh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goggins v. Laurens County Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv00186
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Miller, Laurens County Detention Center and Correctional Officer Armstrong
Plaintiff:
Robert Lamonte Goggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza-Ovalle v. Detention Officer Armstrong et al
as 1:2019cv00895
Plaintiff:
Luis Garza-Ovalle
Defendant:
Warden Renee Alexander, United States Marshall's Office, Chesapeak Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Woods v. Armstrong (MAG+)
as 2:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woods
Defendant:
Officer Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broussard v. Watson et al
as 1:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Broussard
Defendant:
Kendrick Watson, Officer Armstrong, Officer Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Florence
as 13-4604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Florence, Sergeant (Nurse), Geneviene Switz, (P.A), Wladyslaw Sidorowicz, (Doctor) and others
Rice v. Edgecomb et al
as 1:2013cv07695
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L Rice
Defendant:
Jason Edgecomb, Sergeant Clark, Officer Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2013cv03791
Plaintiff:
RONNIE L. DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN BALICKI, OFFICER MACCORI, OFFICER VOHLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Richardson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
John F. Richardson, Deitrich James, John Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingles et al v. Potter et al
as 3:2010cv00965
Plaintiff:
Adam Ingles, Christorpher Jennette, James Small and others
Defendant:
Lieu Potter, Lieu Sterling, Sgt. Ramons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
