Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Keith Cureton v. Officer Cherry
as 23-6328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMAR CURETON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER CHERRY, SERGEANT LEWISE, OFFICER JACKSON and others
Butler v. Cherry et al
as 5:2022ct03446
Plaintiff:
Dominique Jamil Butler
Defendant:
Officer Cherry, Officer Demeri, Officer Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Cherry et al
as 5:2022ct03318
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton
Defendant:
Officer Cherry and Sergeant Lewise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Cureton v. Officer Cherry
as 22-6893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMAR CURETON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER CHERRY and SERGEANT LEWISE
Cureton v. Cherry
as 5:2021ct03372
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton
Defendant:
Officer Cherry and Sergeant Lewise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels vs. Kauffman, et al
as 3:2020cv00442
Defendant:
Officer Henry, Kevin Kauffmann, Officer Cherry and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Lee Harper, Sr. v. Cherry et al
as 2:2019cv06030
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Cherry, Correctional Officer Jones, Correctional Officer Sierra and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Harper, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2019cv03371
Plaintiff:
Andre Diggs
Defendant:
Cynthia Brann, City of New York, Correctional Officer Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 16-2121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JASON KING, Public Defender, CHARLES PATRICK, Solicitor and others
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2016cv02674
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Jason King, Charles Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
