Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Dwayne Hoosier-Bey v. Hudson
as 21-1400
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL TRANSPORTATION OFFICER HUDSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE LAMAR HOOSIER-BEY
Clinton v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv05225
Plaintiff:
Kiquan Clinton
Defendant:
Chief Jailor Adger, Officer Hudson and Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grayling v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00111
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 1, Sgt Lawrence and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Grayling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Page et al
as 5:2018ct03249
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Erik A. Hooks, Paula Page and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks et al
as 5:2018ct03208
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Boyles, Mr. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raheem Jones v. Lieutenant Curry
as 18-6077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHEEM L. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT CURRY, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor, LIEUTENANT DYSON, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor, LIEUTENANT GRIFFEN, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor and others
Abdullah v. Gavin et al
as 0:2017cv02855
Plaintiff:
Rahim Abdullah
Defendant:
Lt. Gavin, Lt. Pressley and Officer Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Luckett et al v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv02324
Plaintiff:
Wallace Luckett and Denise Luckett
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Officer Hudson, Officer Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Volusia County Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01641
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Volusia County Department of Corrections, Officer Mendosa, Halifax Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
