Cases 1 - 10 of 15
French v. Elliott et al
as 1:2023cv01775
Plaintiff:
Aaaron Little French
Defendant:
Lt. Stephen Elliott, Lt. N. Edwards, Lt. Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrne v. Towson Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Russell William Byrne
Defendant:
Towson Detention Center, Lee William Vaughn and Correctional Officer J. Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Leask v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
Ewan Leask
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis and Officer J Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Leask et al
as 4:2022cv02480
Defendant:
Ewan Leask, City of Minneapolis and Officer J Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Leask v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 4:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
Ewan Leask
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis and Officer J Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Duncan v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2022cv04264
Plaintiff:
Andre Duncan
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Nassau County Sheriff's Department, Nassau County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv02298
Plaintiff:
Scott H. Meyer
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, J. Does 1-5 and Police Officers J. Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01588
Defendant:
Joanna Jarzabek, Brian Gluecklich, Raymond Acre and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. TELL et al
as 1:2020cv01295
Defendant:
OFFICER J-DOE #4, RYAN VAN SYKLE, OFFICER EVANS and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONT SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doherty v. St. Louis County et al
as 0:2020cv00385
Defendant:
St. Louis County and Correctional Officers J. Does 1-2
Plaintiff:
Steven Doherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
