Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tressler v. Centre County et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jessica Tressler
Defendant:
Centre County, Centre County Correctional Facility, Glenn Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06406
Plaintiff:
LOREN DAWSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CORRECTION OFFICERS "JOHN DOE(s)" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDDICK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv02825
Plaintiff:
OFFICER ERIC RIDDICK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE PAUL RICH, OFFICER JAMES O'HARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SLEDGE v. BOLT et al
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
LARRY ALLEN SLEDGE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SHAWN BOLT, COUNSELOR HEATHER MARTIN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RYAN TARASOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv09159
Plaintiff:
Kamar Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, Corrections Officers John Doe #'s 1-10, Corrections Captain Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennington v. Satterberg et al
as 2:2018cv01348
Defendant:
Jane Doe(s) Prosecutor(s), John Doe(s) Prosecutor(s), Ryan J. Erwin and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Jane Doe(s) and Jonathan Lawrence Dennington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tejada v. Delbalso et al
as 3:2018cv01096
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
Delbalso, Juksta, Hinnan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2015cv10728
Plaintiff:
Surpaul Cottrell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Parole Board Members Jane and John Doe, Parole Officers John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUMAS v. FERRER et al
as 3:2009cv05871
Plaintiff:
JEROME DUMAS
Defendant:
CARLOS FERRER, JAMES RAULTH, MALAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
