Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Montgomery County Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv02021
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Key
Defendant:
Montgomery County Maryland, Correctional Officer Pate and Correctional Officer Butterworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Anderson v. Pate et al
as 1:2020cv25203
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Limuel Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Pate, Officer Gadson and Mark S. Inch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Howell et al
as 7:2019cv01391
Defendant:
Pastor Chris Hodges, Sgt. Brown, Sheriff Denis Green and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boswell v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00657
Plaintiff:
Armod Rashad Jahmal Boswell
Defendant:
Larry Nixon, Officer Pate and K. Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Nixon et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00600
Plaintiff:
James Daniels, III
Defendant:
Larry Nixon, W. E. Slater, Jerry Gurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores-Bahena v. Hovel et al
as 1:2011cv02671
Plaintiff:
Roberto Flores-Bahena
Defendant:
Officer Hovel, Officer Coleman, Officer Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeter v. Guy et al
as 9:2008cv03806
Plaintiff:
Eric David Jeter
Defendant:
Ms Guy, S Davis, South Carolina Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Butler v. Kelly et al
as 1:2008cv03590
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant:
Seargent Kelly, Seargent Collins, Seargent Nalapia and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vick v. Gay et al
as 5:2008ct03028
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Vick
Defendant:
Wayne V. Gay, County Commissioner, Zacharios Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
