Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gnewuch v. Cook County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2021cv02740
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriffs Office, Dr. Pawfeek, 1st Shift Make Officer Perkins and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Gnewuch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bardinet v. Officer Tolino et al
as 2:2020cv02899
Plaintiff:
DAVID BARDINET
Defendant:
Officer Perkins, #36787, DOES 1-25,, Officer Tolino, # 42738 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Corbett v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03361
Defendant:
Officer Holmes, Mr. Ballard, Sgt. Brounson and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 19-2430
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER PARKER, MRS. ADAMS, OFFICER K. FINN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Cano v. Faust et al
as 4:2019cv00317
Respondent:
Karen Faust, James Jones, Charles James and others
Petitioner:
Juan Daniel Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Page et al
as 5:2018ct03249
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Erik A. Hooks, Paula Page and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks et al
as 5:2018ct03208
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Boyles, Mr. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
