Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rives et al v. University of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Dyllan Rives and James R Rives
Defendant:
University of Tennessee, Donde Plowman, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Transky et al v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 1:2013cv02639
Plaintiff:
Gregg Transky and Sondra Borrie
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission , Ohio Attorney General , Delores Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Erez v. The Cfity Of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09633
Plaintiff:
Mendy Erez
Defendant:
The Cfity Of New York, Michael R. Bloomberg, New York City Police Department (NYPD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mosseri v. Bush et al
as 0:2008cv62088
Plaintiff:
Clement Mosseri
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Postma et al v. Bradley et al
as 0:2007cv04657
Plaintiff:
Harold O Postma and Greta K Postma
Defendant:
Ralff Bradley, Roger Knapper, Leann Knapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLISSON et al v. STRITTMATTER et al
as 1:2007cv01066
Plaintiff:
OLIVER GLISSON, OLIVER GLISSON, OLIVER GLISSON and others
Defendant:
MATT STRITTMATTER, RANDY WRIGHT, DAVE SHAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Choate v. Aleshire et al
as 3:2007cv05010
Plaintiff:
Jack Choate
Defendant:
Mark Aleshire, Christen Shilling, Linda Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
