Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lloyd v. Telleen et al
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lloyd
Defendant:
John Telleen, Micah P. Johnson, Derek G. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard Johnson v. Jason Lewis
as 21-1177
Respondent / Appellee:
Jason Lewis
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bernard P. Johnson
Johnson v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv00559
Plaintiff:
David P. Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lane v. James et al
as 5:2018cv00259
Defendant:
P Johnson, Kedrick R Avery, Patrick Pierre and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lewis
as 1:2018cv00193
Respondent:
Jason Lewis
Petitioner:
Bernard P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02244
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William P. Johnson and Deborah Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derrick Smith v. Ian Wallace, et al
as 16-4438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick Ray Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Ian Wallace, Warden, Mina K. Massey, Prison Doctor, Nina Hill and others
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Assistant Warden, Jane Bucannon, Captain, R. Trout, C.C.A. and others
Mark Neubauer, et al v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 15-3694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Neubauer, an individual in North Dakota and Marken, Inc., a North Dakota corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
FedEx Corporation, a Delaware corporation, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., a Delaware corporation, David F. Rebholz and others
Neubauer et al v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mark Neubauer and Marken, Inc.
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. , David F. Rebholz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
