Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Clark #222915 v. Adams et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
Unknown Adams, T. Lovato, R. Sackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henden #652050 v. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kirk Henden #652050
Defendant:
L. Miller, R. Niemi and P. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Schneider et al
as 4:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Columbus Lewis and Columbus P. Lewis, III
Defendant:
Kevin Schneider, Susan Reynolds and Polk County Commissioner
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Schnieder
as 4:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr, Curtis Tharp, Jonathan McAtee and others
Defendant:
Kevin Schnieder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. WARREN et al
as 3:2020cv05584
Defendant:
NURSE LANCE CARVER, D. SMITH, C. DECRISTI and others
Plaintiff:
MILTON DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARDIN v. LEWIS et al
as 4:2019cv00255
Respondent:
ALAN BEARD, TERRY P LEWIS and GEORGIA CAPPLEMEN
Petitioner:
JOSHUA NEEL HARDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Gusman et al
as 2:2018cv07990
Defendant:
Medical Staff and Sheriff Gusman
Plaintiff:
Leanon P. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davey Enriquez v. TDCJ, et al
as 17-20328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVEY ENRIQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CHRISTOPHER S. LACOX, E. OAKS and others
Enriquez v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2015cv03072
Plaintiff:
Davey Enriquez
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Christopher S. Lacox, E. Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02041
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
