Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 19,128
USA v. Buddy Parker
as 24-1342
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BUDDY RANDAL PARKER
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Susewind, et al.
as 24-2562
Plaintiff: WILD FISH CONSERVANCY
Defendant: KELLY SUSEWIND, in his official capacity as the Director of the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, BARBARA BAKER, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission, MOLLY LINVILLE, in her official capacity as a member of the Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Collier
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff: Sonja Eddings Brown
Defendant: Parker J. Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Parker v. Wyles et al
as 3:2024cv00530
Plaintiff: Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant: Warden Wyles and Dep Warden Callendar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Curvey et al
as 4:2024cv01497
Plaintiff: David Parker
Defendant: Diamiane Diane Curvey and The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Sean Parker
as 24-4218
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SEAN CHRISTIAN PARKER
USA v. Terry Parker
as 24-11203
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TERRY DEWAYNE PARKER
Parker v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: Donnie Parker Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated doing business as Spring Creek Ranch
Defendant: Xcel Energy Services, Inc., Southwestern Public Service Company doing business as Xcel Energy and Osmose Utility Services, Inc.
Parker v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00400
Plaintiff: Erin Jill Parker
Defendant: Lowe's Home Centers LLC and Riverstone Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?