Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Helmer v. Roberts et al
as 6:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Francis D. Helmer
Defendant:
Christina M. Roberts and Pat Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2020cv02710
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
Amicus Curiae:
KEVIN CRAMER, RAND PAUL, CINDY HYDE-SMITH and others
Interested Party:
USA UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loper v. Donnellon et al
as 2:2019cv11843
Defendant:
Direk Evenson, Colleen Spencer, Tiffany Francis and others
Plaintiff:
Kameren Loper
Runion v. Donnellon et al
as 5:2019cv11812
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Runion
Defendant:
Colleen Spencer, Tiffany Francis, David Rushing and others
Reilly v. Spencer et al
as 2:2019cv11249
Defendant:
Derik Evenson, Thomas Buckley, David Rushing and others
Plaintiff:
James Reilly
Windom v. Brady et al
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Alan C. Nelson, Dick Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
I & O Publishing Co., Neo-Tech Research Writing Center and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stewart v. Grassley et al
as 2:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Maggie Hassan, James Lankford, Mike Crapo and others
Plaintiff:
PJ Stewart
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ROBERTS et al v. FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 4:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAT ROBERTS and MAT MEDIA LLC
Defendant:
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and RICHARD CORCORAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gorbey v. OBAMA
as 17-6035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, United States President Washington D.C., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Washington DC, LINDSEY GRAHAM, U.S. Senate South Carolina and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
