Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tournoux v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv02398
Plaintiff:
Patrick Tournoux
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
MCGUIRE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2026cv02068
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. MCGUIRE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07521
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2026cv00951
Plaintiff:
Patrick D Thompson
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, National Appeals Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Rutz v. Faulkner County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2026cv00950
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Rutz
Defendant:
Faulkner County, Arkansas, Patrick Toft and Charlie Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Phillips et al
as 4:2026cv00393
Plaintiff:
Isaac Lopez
Defendant:
Joel Phillips, Patrick White, Dan McCready and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Woods et al
as 5:2026cv00661
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lamar Bryant
Defendant:
Billy Woods and Ms. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Soliman v. State of Florida
as 6:2026cv02081
Petitioner:
Mark Patrick Soliman
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05344
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cimino v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv50427
Plaintiff:
Patrick Philip Cimino
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
