Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dib v. F4L Sports, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Dib
Defendant:
F4L Sports, Inc., Perk Fitness of Spring Lake, Inc., Fit4Life Franchising, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Michael DeSpain v. Louisville Metropolitan Government, et al
as 21-6237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESPAIN and MICHAEL R. DESPAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, STEVE CONRAD, Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT KIT STEMILE and others
Humphrey et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Paul Humphrey and Mary Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. HUMPHREY et al
as 1:2019cv04950
Petitioner:
MYKEL EZRA SMITH
Respondent:
PAUL HUMPHREY and INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Humphrey et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv02274
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Paul Humphrey and Mary Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVERA v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2016cv01493
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RIVERA
Defendant:
JOHN C. THOMAS , BOBBY ZANKEL , PETER ABHULIMEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01689
Plaintiff:
Loretta Humphrey and Paul Humphrey
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Templeton v. Nicks et al
as 3:2008cv00511
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P. Templeton
Defendant:
Diane M. Nicks and Paul Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damien Paul Humphrey v. California Supreme Court et al
as 2:2007cv05085
Petitioner:
Damien Paul Humphrey
Respondent:
California Supreme Court and California Court of Appeal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
