Cases 11 - 20 of 5,363
Pearson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
James W. Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Heather Pearson, Vanmetter, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saintillus v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2493
Plaintiff:
CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILLIP A. TALBERT, GRANT RABENN and others
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Richard v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Carl Richard
Defendant:
Superintendent Barry Smith, Wellpath Medical Co., Dr. Muhammad Naji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pearson v. Advent Health et al
as 8:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Vernon Jewel Pearson, III
Defendant:
Advent Health and Gracepoint Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quiero Jr. v. Stohor
as 1:2024cv00579
Defendant:
Justin Stohor and Justin Pearson, Justin Parson
Plaintiff:
Avon C. Quiero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
