Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 4:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brown v. Lutti et al (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Allegheny County Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 3:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 6:2015cv01289
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 2:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Jeremy Kobeski, Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 1:2015cv01526
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Allegheny County Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 5:2015cv00844
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Allegheny County Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 1:2015cv00293
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BOGAN v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT et al
as 5:2014cv05310
Plaintiff:
EDWARD D. BOGAN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT, PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, ALAN J. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sang Ly v. Pennsylvania Supreme Court, et al
as 14-3014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANG NAM LY
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT, DOUGLAS G. ARRON, PHILIP MURRAY BRICKNELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
