Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Danielle Smith, et al v. Pepsi Americas, et al
as 11-16958
Plaintiff:
HARRY WHITLOCK
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIELLE SMITH and JO ANN WAKELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
PEPSI AMERICAS, PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION and PNEUMO ABEX, LLC
Melissa Dalton, et al v. Pepsi Americas, et al
as 10-16074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA ANASTASIOU DALTON, individually and as guardian ad litem for Kala Smith, Rebekah Mabery Anastasiou and Michael Mabery and RALPH WEBER
Plaintiff:
HARRY WHITLOCK, FERN BROYLES, SHEBIA CORNETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PEPSI AMERICAS, PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION and PNEUMO ABEX, LLC
Lopez-Arguelles v. Pepsi Americas PR., Inc.
as 3:2009cv02277
Plaintiff:
Graciela Lopez Arguelles
Defendant:
Pepsi Americas PR., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GIBBS v. KMART CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv05346
Plaintiff:
SUSAN GIBBS
Defendant:
KMART CORPORATION and PEPSI AMERICAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Danielle Smith et al v. Pepsi Americas et al
as 3:2008cv02742
Plaintiff:
Yvette James, Fern Sue Broyles, Rebecca Lynne and others
Defendant:
Whitman Corporation, Markien Willburn, Pneumo Abex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
