Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Seal v. The Pepsico Inc. Long-Term Disability Program
as 1:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Donald Seal
Defendant:
The Pepsico Inc. Long-Term Disability Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
VICKERS v. PEPSICO, INC. et al
as 0:2017cv61746
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VICKERS
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC., RANDY ROBLES and JASON SCHENKMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Thornton v. Greyhawk Leasing, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv01769
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thornton
Defendant:
Greyhawk Leasing, LLC and Pepsico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Helton v. Pepsi-Cola Sales and Distribution, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01135
Plaintiff:
Helton and Nathaniel Helton
Defendant:
Pepsi-Cola Sales and Distribution, Inc, Pepsi-Cola Sales and Distribution, Inc., PepsiCo, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Pepsico Inc.
as 2:2016cv13896
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joe C. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
SMITH v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02086
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. DISABILITY PLAN and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WHITE V. PEPSICO, INC., SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
MARLENA WHITE
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC., SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN and PEPSICO, INC., LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
DUMONT v. PEPSICO INC et al
as 1:2015cv00369
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK J DUMONT
Defendant:
PEPSICO INC and PEPSICO ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Houston v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00829
Plaintiff:
Derrick Houston
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acosta et al v. Frito-Lay, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02128
Defendant:
Frito-Lay, Inc. , FL Transportation Inc. and PEPSICO, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Acosta , Greg Frye , Jose Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
