Cases 11 - 20 of 296
Moore v. PHH Mortgage Servicing et al
as 2:2024cv10358
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Moore
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Servicing and John Doe
Lopez-Garcia v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Onesimo Lopez-Garcia
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation doing business as PHH Mortgage Services, NewRez and PHH Mortgage Corporation doing business as PHH Mortgage Services, NewRez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dombrowski v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Travers A. Dombrowski
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation doing business as PHH Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hussain Kareem v. NewRez LLC, et al
as 24-1018
Plaintiff:
HUSSAIN KAREEM
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE CORP, doing business as PHH Mortgage Services and NEWREZ LLC
Maksym Tokarev v. PHH Mortgage Services et al
as 2:2023cv10883
Plaintiff:
MAKSYM TOKAREV
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Services and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. PHH Mortgage Servicers et al
as 3:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Latesha Shante Murphy
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Servicers, The Federal Savings Bank, Sheriff Department of New Haven County and others
Anderson v. PHH Mortgage Services Corporation
as 3:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
Benita Anderson
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Services Corporation
IBLE v. PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES et al
as 4:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
ISHANNA M IBLE
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES and ALDRIDGE PITE LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
