Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Layfield v. United States of America
as 26-4737
Petitioner: PHILIP JAMES LAYFIELD and Philip Samuel Pesin
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Layfield
as 26-4703
Defendant: PHILIP JAMES LAYFIELD and Philip Samuel Pesin
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arroyo v. Rios et al
as 6:2026cv01551
Plaintiff: Gabriel Arroyo
Defendant: Detective Sara Rios, Detective Nicholas Lorenzano, Sergeant Philip James Shorette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyrpych v. Kelly, et al
as 26-1770
Plaintiff: YAROSLAV KYRPYCH
Defendant: KRISTEN DENISE KELLY, individually and in the Official Capacity as ADA Norfolk County District Attorney, KATELYN MARIE JAY, individually and in the Official Capacity as ADA Norfolk County District Attorney, ELISE MARIAN BARRY, individually and in the Official Capacity as Employee of Department of Children and Families and others
Layfield v. Hudson
as 4:2026cv00295
Petitioner: Philip James Layfield
Respondent: B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Philip Dupree
as 26-4296
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: PHILIP JAMES DUPREE
Mancuso v. Garton et al
as 3:2026cv01083
Plaintiff: Philip James Mancuso
Defendant: Sheriff Mark Garton, Jail Staff, Judge Timothy Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durbin v. Garcia
as 2:2026cv11719
Petitioner: Philip James Durbin
Respondent: Jason Garcia
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Tracy v. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00396
Plaintiff: Philip James Tracy
Defendant: Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Emerson v. Thomas
as 26-40269
Petitioner: Philip James Emerson, Jr.
Respondent: F. Duncan Thomas and Kevin White

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?