Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Hill et al v. Waste Management Inc. of Tennessee et al
as 1:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Darlene Hill , Roy Garrett , Tri-County Environmental Association, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Waste Management Inc. of Tennessee and Cedar Ridge Landfill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Allen v. Director of Administrator of Social Security
as 2:2009cv00191
Plaintiff:
Phillips Allen
Defendant:
Director of Administrator of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Royall v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Phillip Allen Royall
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Bank of America N.A. et al v. Breslin et al
as 1:2009cv01052
Plaintiff:
Bank of America N.A. and Banc of America Investment Services Inc
Defendant:
Hugh Breslin, Phillip Allen and UBS Financial Management Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Phillip Dye, et al v. State of DE, et al
as 08-4447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP A. DYE, AKA Phillip Allen and REBECCA JANE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF DE and INDYMAC BANK
Jackson v. Allen et al
as 4:2008cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darryl Jackson
Defendant:
Phillip Allen and Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Fictitious Foreign State et al
as 1:2008cv00491
Plaintiff:
Phillip Allen and Rebecca Jane
Defendant:
Fictitious Foreign State, State Of Delaware and Indymac Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALLEN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 5:2008cv80982
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP ALLEN
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, GRAVES-ABER INSULATION COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Wing v. Schweitzer et al
as 6:2008cv00034
Plaintiff:
Phillip Allen Wing
Defendant:
Brian Schweitzer, Montana Department of Corrections, Mike Ferriter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
