Cases 21 - 30 of 578
PONDER v. DOES et al
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells et al v. Ponder et al (TV2)
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Azia Wells and James Wells, Jr.
Defendant:
Jason Ponder and Dale Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PONDER v. BLOODSAW et al
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
GEORGIA BLOODSAW, DEMETRIUS SWINT, DANIELS CYNTHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponder et al v. United States of America, The et al
as 4:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ponder and Micheal Ponder
Defendant:
The United States of America, Creek Nation Community Hospital, Regional Brain Institute, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pacheco v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Shelby Wyatt, Jonathan Call, FNU Tilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ponder v. Hans-Peter Wild
as 23-5620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL H. PONDER
Defendant / Appellee:
HANS-PETER WILD
WHITE-SMITH v. REDD et al
as 2:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
SHANIA WHITE-SMITH
Defendant:
YACIN REDD, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DUSTIN PONDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
REDD
as 2:2023cv02532
Plaintiff:
YACIN REDD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USPOSTALSERVICE and JUSTIN PONDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
REDD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
YACIN REDD
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and JUSTIN PONDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ponder
as 0:2023mc60899
Plaintiff:
Josephine Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
