Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mack v. Psychemedics Corporation
as 2:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Charles Mack
Defendant:
Psychemedics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Enma Sagastume v. Psychemedics Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv06624
Defendant:
Psychemedics Corporation and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Enma Sagastume
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bernat v. Psychemedics Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bernat
Defendant:
Psychemedics Corporation and General Electic Corporation
Quire v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2019cv10504
Plaintiff:
Brian Quire
Defendant:
Thomas Cairns, Psychemedics Corporation, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Shaw v. Psychemedics Corporation
as 7:2017cv01626
Plaintiff:
Wilmot Shaw
Defendant:
Psychemedics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tilson et al v. DISA, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv00240
409) 833-0680 (fax:
Christy Amuny
Defendant:
Raynando L Banks, Clinical Pathology Laboratories, Inc., DISA Global Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Tilson and Emile Tilson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Baughman v. Psychemedics Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv10191
Plaintiff:
Austin Baughman
Defendant:
Psychemedics Corporation , Raymond C. Kubacki and Neil Lerner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
