Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hickman v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Hickman and Anthony Scott Hickman
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric J Holcomb, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Alvarez v. Dowd et al
as 3:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Cresencio Alvarez, III
Defendant:
Patrik Dowd, Peter Britton, Elzabeth Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarez v. Dowd et al
as 3:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Cresencio Alvarez, III
Defendant:
Patrick Dowd, Olmstead and Kendra Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peavy v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Peavy
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Patrick Dowd, South Bend City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHESHER et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
SHANE CHESTER, JOANNE M. KING, ANDREW NOSBISCH and others
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, RICH FITZGERALD, LAURA ZASPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyler v. Dowd
as 4:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Patrick Dowd
Plaintiff:
Larry Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fleming Zulack and Williamson, LLP v. Dunbar et al
as 3:2008mc00062
Plaintiff:
Fleming Zulack and Williamson, LLP and Fleming Zulack and Williamson, LLP
Defendant:
Dennis J. Dunbar, Patrick Dowd, Patrick Dowd and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
