Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
MULLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02183
Plaintiff:
SEAN PATRICK MULLEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02861
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Jones et al v. Manchester, NH, City of et al
as 1:2017cv00023
Defendant:
Ryan Boyd, Kenneth Brunini, Clifford Ellston and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Jones, John Jones and Samantha O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
FRIEND v. CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE FRIEND
Defendant:
CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT , CITY OF CHESTER , PATRICK MULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumanga v. SPLA/SPLM et al
as 4:2013cv03212
Defendant:
CWS U.SA, Bill Clinton, Omar El Bashir and others
Plaintiff:
Chaplain Loruwi Lumanga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beyah v. Laidlaw
as 13-903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Murad Hasan Beyah
Defendant - Appellee:
John Laidlaw, Paul Berry, Christine Sztechmiller and others
MYERS v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv03660
Plaintiff:
VALERIE MYERS
Defendant:
DEMOSS JONES, L. PAPARO, BROCKWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITEHEAD v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv03662
Plaintiff:
RONELL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
DEMOSS JONES, L. PAPARO, BROCKWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
