Cases 1 - 10 of 100
James Patton v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv01203
Plaintiff:
James Patton
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
PATTON v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv07046
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. PATTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Hunter International, Inc. v. Patton
as 1:2026cv02195
Plaintiff:
Hunter International, Inc.
Defendant:
James Patton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Fields et al v. Bojarski et al
as 1:2026cv00254
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Fields and Joanna M. Shepherd
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Bojarski, Scott Patton, Stuart Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Patton v. City of Birmingham Alabama et al
as 2:2026cv01604
Plaintiff:
Jaylin Artez Patton
Defendant:
City of Birmingham Alabama and Birmingham Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hukel v. RV S&E LLC dba CORVETTE BAR AND GRILL et al
as 1:2026cv01803
Plaintiff:
Don Hukel
Defendant:
RV S&E LLC dba CORVETTE BAR AND GRILL, Josephine County, Misty Strohmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sundus Jaber v. 35th District Court, et al
as 26-1742
Plaintiff:
SUNDUS K. JABER
Defendant:
35TH DISTRICT COURT, REGIONAL MANAGED ASSIGNED COUNSEL OFFICE, RMACO, CHIEF JUDGE RONALD W. LOWE and others
PATTON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv06202
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DUANE PATTON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01759
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
