Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Braithwaite v. Guilette et al
as 5:2026ct03220
Plaintiff:
Akeem Braithwaite
Defendant:
Alina Guilette, Kelton Glorfield, J. Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Patton, Jr.In re: Richard Patton, Jr.
as 26-12528
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD PATTON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RANGER v. METZGAR et al
as 1:2026cv00180
Plaintiff:
ROBERT-DAVID RANGER
Defendant:
JAMES METZGAR, MICHAEL B. CARROLL, KARA TAMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv01649
Plaintiff:
Chrystal Patton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Patton-Thomas v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08400
Plaintiff:
Virginia Patton-Thomas
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Sam's West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Patton v. Day et al
as 2:2026cv01536
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Patton
Defendant:
Travis Day and Gary Westcott
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
G. et al v. Winchester Elementary School et al
as 2:2026cv02818
Plaintiff:
C. G. and S. S.
Defendant:
Winchester Elementary School, Memphis Shelby County Schools, Jennifer Jaggers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herring v. Lorenzo et al
as 5:2026cv02714
Plaintiff:
Dusty Wayne Herring
Defendant:
Officer Lindsay Lorenzo, J Gee, Chris Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Benjamin Hendren v. John Patton, et al
as 26-12393
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN HENDREN
Defendant:
JOHN PATTON, JAMAR REED, ANTHONY EWING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
