Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Prepaid Ventures, Ltd. v. Compton
as 23-596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Prepaid Ventures, Ltd., PPV Holdings, LLC and PPV Merchant Solutions, LLC, DBA CapX Payments
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Compton, Pablo Garcia, ProfitStat, LLC and others
Defendant:
ABC Companies 1-10 and John and Jane Does I-V
Jeffreys v. Carson et al
as 1:2020cv00331
Plaintiff:
Madeliene Y. Jeffreys
Defendant:
Benjamin Carson and Paul Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Compton v. SunTrust Bank
as 2:2020cv02431
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Defendant:
Sun Trust Bank and Sun Trust Bank formerly doing business as National Bank of Commerce
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Paul Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prepaid Ventures, Ltd. et al v. Compton et al
as 2:2018cv02102
Defendant:
Paul Compton, John and Jane Does I-V, Pablo Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
PPV Holdings, LLC, Prepaid Ventures, Ltd., PPV Merchant Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant:
FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, GDC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH R. LISTER
Defendant:
FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, BARRY J. CADDEN and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Norris, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOCELYN KAE NORRIS
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant:
LINDA LUI LUONG, FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Cox v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02501
Defendant:
City of New York, Andrea Compton, Paul Compton and others
Plaintiff:
Carole Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Non-Motor Vehicle
EPSG, LLC v. CC&H Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv06739
Defendant:
CC&H Enterprises, LLC and Paul Compton
Plaintiff:
EPSG, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hieda Keeler v. James Fox
as 13-1328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HIEDA A. KEELER
Defendant - Appellee:
POLICE CHIEF JAMES D. FOX, OFFICER THOMAS A. SHULL, JR., OFFICER JUSTIN BRIGGS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
