Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Moore v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Terrence Moore
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle, Paul Harris, Etherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3752
Plaintiff:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Lewis Shuler, Jr. v. Adam Weeks, et al
as 23-5946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWIS SHULER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM C. WEEKS, PAUL HARRIS, JACK STANLEY and others
United States of America v. Ayers (Smith)
as 23-7119
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL SMITH
Lee v. Patterson et al
as 4:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Mariquse McCan, Cieria Wasghington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweat v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2023cv04478
Petitioner:
Paul Harris Sweat
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
CARL PAUL HARRIS JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paul Harris v. Oran Schachter, et al
as 23-55664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ORAN SCHACHTER, DPM, KAISER PERMANENTE and others
IN RE: HARRIS et al
as 2:2023cv02793
Plaintiff:
PAUL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
