Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gary et al v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2018cv02756
Plaintiff:
Ontario Hiler, Paul Pearson, Nicco Spates and others
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Amy P. Weirich, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03094
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated, Lisa Brewer, Christie Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Paul Pearson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Samuel Pearson v. Oakland County Circuit Court, et al
as 15-1263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL PAUL PEARSON, named as Samuel Paul Pearson
Defendant - Appellee:
OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, also named as Sixth Judicial Circuit Court (Oakland County), UNKNOWN PARTIES1, named as Judicial Clerk (John Doe) and subordinate clerks and staff (John/Jane Does), LASHEA SIMONS, Grievance Coordinator for the MDOC at MCF, also named as Ms. Simons and others
Foudy et al v. Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2012cv14462
Plaintiff:
Toni Foudy and Shaun Foudy
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office, Indian River County Sheriffs Office, Gerald M. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moraes v. Mascara et al
as 2:2012cv14155
Plaintiff:
Arthur Moraes
Defendant:
Ken Mascara , Pauline Russ, Walter Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Samuel Pearson v. Blaine Lafler
as 11-2095
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL PAUL PEARSON
Respondent - Appellee:
BLAINE LAFLER
Pearson v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv00383
Plaintiff:
Paul Pearson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2008cv00217
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Paul Pearson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
