Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Ramirez v. Adventist Medical Center et al
as 3:2017cv00831
Defendant:
Adventist Medical Center, Department of Health and Human Services, Does 1 to 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Maricela Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thomas v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
as 2:2017cv02264
Plaintiff:
Carrolet Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Jocelyn Samuels, Robinsue Frohboese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Kendrix et al
as 2:2016mc00180
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Peggy Lee Kendrix
Garnishee:
Washington State Dept of Retirement Systems
Hyatt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11461
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lee Hyatt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatfield v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2016cv05148
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lee Hatfield
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv03814
Plaintiff:
Joyce Adams , Joyce Kessinger , Karla Faraci and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00477
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lee
Defendant:
Higbee Lancoms, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spanier et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv09610
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lee Spanier and Dennis W. Spanier
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conklin v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv07833
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lee Conklin
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lee v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv16778
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lee
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
