Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Epps v. UTMB at Galveston
as 23-40198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony Epps
Defendant / Appellee:
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, Unknown Drug Company and others
Abu-Nantambu-El v. Mr. Long
as 1:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Abdu-Latif Kazembe Abu-Nantambu-El
Defendant:
Long, (I) Long, Major Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00233
Defendant:
Z CULPEPPER, K LURRY, J COKER and others
Plaintiff:
AARON C PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Merten et al
as 1:2018cv02863
Defendant:
Elbel, Haley Faulkner, Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michel Desta v. Wins Finance Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02983
Plaintiff:
Michel Desta
Defendant:
Jianming Hao, Peiling Amy He, Renhui Mu and others
Crawford v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2016cv10218
Plaintiff:
Anitra Elaine Crawford
Defendant:
Randall Stephenson, AT&T, Southfield OCC Library and others
Peil et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al.
as 0:2015cv02618
Plaintiff:
Kevin Peil and Diana Peil
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peile v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv04361
Plaintiff:
Edmond Peile
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zounek et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv02366
Plaintiff:
Vincent F. Zounek and Susan Peil
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peil v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01246
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Peil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
