Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Cardinale, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 11-80102
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ANTHONY CARDINALE, MICHAEL CHEK, DONNA JEANNE FLANAGAN and others
Defendant - Respondent:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and others
Burke et al v. BP Corporation North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02640
Plaintiff:
Peter Burke , Ryan Lykins , Jorg M. Junghann and others
Defendant:
BP Corporation North America, Inc. , BP America, Inc. , Transocean Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. BP Corporation North America, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00195
Defendant:
BP Corporation North America, Inc., BP America Inc. and Transocean Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Peter Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peter Burke, Sr. v. Officer Judge
as 10-6215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER BURKE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER JAMES JUDGE and OFFICER GARY BRAY
Defendant - None:
CAPTAIN DAVID OWENS, DOCTOR TOLSON, NURSE GEORGIA and others
Burke v. Pasquotank County Board of Election - North Carolina
as 2:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Peter Burke, Sr.
Defendant:
Pasquotank County Board of Election - North Carolina
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burke v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01236
Plaintiff:
Peter Burke, Peter Burke, Peter Burke and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Burke v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01236
Plaintiff:
Peter Burke, Peter Burke, Peter Burke and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
