Cases 31 - 40 of 401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Amy Sherlock, et al v. Gina Austin, et al
as 23-55018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY SHERLOCK, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, T.S. and S.S
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FLORES, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual, AUSTIN LEGAL GROUP APC, a California Corporation, JOEL R. WOHLFEIL, an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv04706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
DOUGHERTY v. COUNTY OF VERMILLION, INDIANA et al
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATTHEW DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VERMILLION, INDIANA, TIM YOCUM and MIKE PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Novick et al v. Village of Bourbonnais et al
as 2:2022cv02259
Plaintiff:
Alexis Novick and Ruth Ann Menz
Defendant:
Village of Borbonnais, Officer Garcia, Jim Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phelps v. Hohlreider Automotive Company et al
as 2:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Stacy Phelps
Defendant:
Hohlreider Automotive Company and Austin Van Sloten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
