Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bailey v. Einerson et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson Bailey
Defendant:
Carol Lynnie Einerson, Michael Zener, Mary LeFavre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Lloyd
as 1:2015cv04001
Plaintiff:
Phillip Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Lance Lloyd and Maryland State Police Barrack 'E'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip Bailey v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-40144
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP MARK BAILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Marrissette v. Taylor et al
as 3:2011cv01143
Plaintiff:
Keith Marrissette
Defendant:
Gladyse Taylor, Jody Goetting, Allen Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2011cv00680
Petitioner:
Phillip Mark Bailey
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillip Craig Bailey v. Ian Parkinson et al
as 2:2011cv10167
Plaintiff:
Phillip Craig Bailey
Defendant:
Ian Parkinson, Ian Parkinson, S L O County Jail Medical Department and others
Clay v. Unknown Party et al
as 3:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Marcus Clay
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Phillip L Bailey and Gilbert Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04691
Plaintiff:
TUNG HOUSTON, YVONNE ADAMS, CELIA AGUILAR and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Houston et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 4:2009cv02615
Plaintiff:
Tung Houston, Yvonne Adams, Celia Aguilar and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
