Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Jackson v. Dart
as 1:2016cv06411
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Graham et al.
as 1:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Troy Eric Barnes
Defendant:
Richard J. Graham, Jr., Bradley Butler, Stephen T. Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson
Defendant:
David Gutierrez and Beth Benoit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Stephens
as 2:2015cv00325
Petitioner:
Phillip Jackson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2015cv00871
Petitioner:
KENNETH PHILLIP JACKSON
Respondent:
TREVOR A. WINGARD and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Cartledge
as 4:2015cv02537
Petitioner:
Phillip Jackson
Respondent:
Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20580
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson, Jr. and Dorothy Jackson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03444
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson, Jr. and Dorothy Jackson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Victor Acevedo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05661
Plaintiff:
Victor Acevedo, Everardo Amaral, Andreas An and others
Movant:
Adrian Chin and Yvette Perez
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Mighty Men of God, Inc. v. World Outreach Church of Murfreesboro Tennessee, Incorporated et al
as 6:2014cv00947
Plaintiff:
Mighty Men of God, Inc.
Defendant:
World Outreach Church of Murfreesboro Tennessee, Incorporated, Intend Ministries, Angus Buchan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
