Cases
Baker et al v. Walmart Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01066
Plaintiff: Phyllis Baker and Wisconsin Masons Health Care Fund d/b/a Humana Insurance Company
Defendant: Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Steven Zirko v. Parthasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 18-2039
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN ZIRKO
Defendant - Appellee: PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor, CATALINO BAUTISTA, M.D., MARCUS HARDY, Warden and others
Ramesh Patel v. Phyllis Baker et al
as 2:2018cv00320
Defendant: Phyllis Baker and Does
Plaintiff: Ramesh Patel
Toy v. Beckway et al
as 1:2017cv04357
Defendant: Cathy Beckway, Joel Starkey, Charles Best and others
Plaintiff: Damen L. Toy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Johnson v. DC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-5207
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michael Roy Johnson
Defendant - Appellee: District of Columbia, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, John A. Burke, Detective, Metropolitan Police Department and others
Papesh et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv03252
Plaintiff: Amy L Papesh, Amy L Papesh, Phyllis Baker and others
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Papesh et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv02305
Plaintiff: Amy L Papesh, Ivan A Baker and Phyllis Baker
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montgomery v. Craig et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00094
Plaintiff: Clyde O. Montgomery
Defendant: T.R. Craig, Paul Edglin and Phyllis Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?