Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc. v. Pike Electric, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC and Pike Telecom and Renewables, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Leblanc v. Pike Electric, LLC
as 9:2024cv02509
Plaintiff:
Michael Leblanc
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra
Young v. Campbell et al
as 1:2016cv01166
Defendant:
John Doe and Pike Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
North Hills Medical Center LLC v. Whiting Construction Co Inc et al
as 6:2016cv02740
Plaintiff:
North Hills Medical Center LLC
Defendant:
Whiting Construction Co Inc , Pike Electric LLC and USIC Locating Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Torbett v. Pike Electric, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Emily E. Torbett
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC and James A. Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Siguenza v. Hensley et al
as 1:2015cv01445
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Siguenza
Defendant:
Darren Q. Hensley and Pike Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meade et al v. McWhorter et al
as 3:2014cv18132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meade and Elsa Meade
Defendant:
Michael B. McWhorter and Pike Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pike Electric, LLC v. Justice Low Seam Mining, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00373
Plaintiff:
Pike Electric, LLC
Defendant:
Justice Low Seam Mining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridgette Neal v. Duke Energy
as 12-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGETTE NEAL, a/k/a Bridgette T. Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY, PIKE ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC WORKS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
