Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Andrews v. United States of America
as 24-794
Petitioner:
LEMREY ANDREWS, Pimp Blood Red, Pimp Bloody and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Portee (Andrews)
as 23-8046
Defendant:
OMAR PORTEE, PAULETTE MCCARTHA, GARY E. JACKSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LEMREY ANDREWS, Pimp Blood Red, Pimp Bloody and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Lamond McCabe
as 23-2197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lamond Leroy McCabe, also known as Pimp
Raner v. The Fun Pimps Entertainment LLC
as 3:2022cv05718
Plaintiff:
Ryan Raner
Defendant:
The Fun Pimps Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thompson v. United States of America
as 22-1529
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alvaun Thompson, AKA LP, AKA Legit Pimp, AKA AT
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Jerome Martin, Jr.
as 21-3078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jerome Martin, Jr., also known as Pimp
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ramirez-Fort v. MUSC, et al
as 20-1563
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKNE HYMEL, a/k/a Pimp Daddy's Chief Resident, DIANA MULLIS, JENNIFER L. HARPER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIGDALIA RAMIREZ-FORT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. The Pimps, a/k/a The Good Year Pimps et al
as 3:2019cv50276
Defendant:
The Pimps, David John Derosso, Anthony David Crisman and others
Plaintiff:
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
