Cases 1 - 10 of 316
Pittman v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02267
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Shanitha Pittman
Defendant:
Michael Amos Harris, M.A.D.E. Creations, Inc., RJ Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Phillips v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Herman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor William Lee, David Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5219
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Pittman v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Kim Antonio Pittman
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Stark-Pittman v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Stark-Pittman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pittman v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bobby James Pittman
Defendant:
Evans, John Doe and Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pittman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04200
Plaintiff:
Darla Pittman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pittman v. United States
as 3:2023cv02281
Petitioner:
Steven Pittman, Jr.
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pittman v. B-Lovette, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Sonya Pittman
Defendant:
B-Lovette LLC, Arkeyia Walker and B-Lovette, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
