Cases 1 - 8 of 8
(PS) Chiu v. The President of the US, et al.,
as 2:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Taifusin Chiu
Defendant:
The President of the US and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bernice Conley et al v. Joseph R. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv07878
Plaintiff:
Bernice Conley
Petitioner:
United States Department of Justice
Defendant:
President of the US Joseph R. Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baez v. Brennan et al
as 3:2019cv01558
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States Attorney's Office, PRESIDENT OF THE US Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Baez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Layne Lindberg, et al v. James Dimon, et al
as 19-1883
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney David C. Piper, US Bank National Association, Jay Bray, Chief Executive Officer & Chairman Nationstar Mortgage LLC, doing business as Mr. Cooper and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Barbara J. Lindberg and Layne A. Lindberg
Karnoski et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv03164
Plaintiff:
Petty Ofc. 2nd Class Phillip Stephens, D. L., Jane Doe and others
Respondent:
Dr. Paul R. McHugh
Defendant:
United States of America, President of the US Donald J. Trump, United States Department of Defense and others
Cox v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2012cv00591
Plaintiff:
Paul Leslie Cox
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Solicitor General and President of the US of A
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Presidency of the US, The
as 2:2010cv03262
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Nelson
Defendant:
Presidency of the US, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Levon v. Barack Obama, et al
as 09-5218
Petitioner - Appellant:
Todd Levon
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President of the US, The White House and Harley G. Lappin, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
