Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Garrett Sorezo v. Buckingham Palace, et al
as 22-2016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRETT MJ TALIF SOREZO
Defendant / Appellee:
BUCKINGHAM PALACE, PRINCE WILLIAM OF ENGLAND, PRINCE HARRY OF ENGLAND and others
Sorezo v. Buckingham Palace et al
as 1:2022cv12540
Plaintiff:
Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo
Defendant:
Buckingham Palace, Prince William, Prince Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorezo v. Buckingham Palace et al
as 1:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo
Defendant:
Buckingham Palace, Prince William, Prince Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lindblad v. United States Government
as 4:2021cv05705
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Lindblad and Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
United States Government, United States Attorney's Office, Civil Process Clerk, Senator Lindsey Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks et al v. President Trump Articles of Impeachment et al
as 2:2020cv00680
Petitioner:
Prince Harry, Frederick Banks and Meghan Markle
Respondent:
Beforeitsnews.com, Daily Mirror, U.S. Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv00379
Defendant:
Obama, Felicia Dunn Burkes, Nescaterica Bates and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson and Madie Ruth Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Josephs v. Offutt, et al
as 15-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOPHIA JOSEPHS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID OFFUTT, CLAUDE JOSEPH, KEITH HAWKINS and others
Josephs v. Offutt et al
as 1:2015cv10038
Plaintiff:
Sophia Josephs
Defendant:
David Offutt, Claude Joseph, Keith Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. President of South Africa et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
President of South Africa, Iraq, Kuwait and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
