Cases 1 - 10 of 31
PUETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02552
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WAYNE PUETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PUETT v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01649
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PUETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puett v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Timothy Puett
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLLC
Thomas v. Buchanan County, Missouri et al
as 5:2018cv06066
Defendant:
Bill Puett, Buchanan County, Missouri, Carolyn Sneed and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Lassiter et al
as 1:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Lassiter, David Mitchell, Herbert Corpening and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Puett v. Randall et al
as 1:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
Robert Newton Puett, Jr.
Defendant:
Frederick Randall and Landstar Inway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coats v. Puett et al
as 5:2017cv06022
Plaintiff:
Charles LeRoy Coats, Jr
Defendant:
Bill Puett, Cates and Advanced Corrections Healthcare Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDDEN-PUETT, et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2015cv01000
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANNA L. REDDEN-PUETT and ESTATE OF ARTHENA REDDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puett, Sr. v. DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20578
Plaintiff:
Clifford Puett, Sr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POFF et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05868
Plaintiff:
MELISSA POFF , LLOYD J. PUETT , WILLIAM L. QUICK and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
