Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Quikrete Companies, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Oregon
as 3:2021cv01478
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Oregon and BLM OR-ST Ofc. Proc. Mgmt. Br.
Plaintiff:
Quikrete Companies, Inc. doing business as Big R Bridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Nolen v. The Quikrete Companies, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv02032
Plaintiff:
David Nolen
Defendant:
The Quikrete Companies, Inc., The Quikrete Companies, LLC and Quikrete Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Home Depot, Inc., The et al
as 4:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Albert Young
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc., The , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Quikrete Companies, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hance v. The Quikrete Companies, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Harry Wayne Hance and Larry Warren Hance, Sr
Defendant:
The Quikrete Companies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01682
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05839
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
